Data transfer objects are associated with views 數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象與視圖關(guān)聯(lián)
Class is a data transfer object 類(lèi)是一個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)換對(duì)象( dto ) 。
The problem : which data transfer object is returned by which entity 問(wèn)題:哪個(gè)數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象由哪個(gè)實(shí)體返回?
It seems obvious that session beans with data transfer objects will play a role in the implementation ) ,很明顯帶有數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象的會(huì)話(huà)bean就會(huì)在實(shí)現(xiàn)中扮演重要角色。
It is also great that you are already using data transfer objects , basically the same as service data objects 同樣使用數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象也是非常好的,基本上同服務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)象類(lèi)似。
A data transfer object is often little more than a bunch of fields and getters and setters for these fields 數(shù)據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)象常常只不過(guò)是一些字段以及這些字段的getters和setters 。
" in many ways , a data transfer object is one of those objects our mothers told us never to write “在許多方面,數(shù)據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)象都是一種我們的父輩曾經(jīng)告誡我們從來(lái)就不要編寫(xiě)對(duì)象。
I have been following your articles lately and had to comment about the use of data transfer objects dtos 我已經(jīng)讀過(guò)您最近的文章,對(duì)于數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象( dto ) ,我想提出一些自己的看法。
However , given the specialized nature of data transfer objects , there is usually no behavior for them to inherit 然而,如果給定數(shù)據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)移對(duì)象的具體種類(lèi),通常就沒(méi)有行為用于它們的繼承。
The use of the data transfer object minimizes the chattiness between the layers - only one stateless call is needed 數(shù)據(jù)傳輸對(duì)象的使用最小化了不同層之間的間隔= =僅僅需要一個(gè)無(wú)狀態(tài)調(diào)用。