例句與造句

1. An impersonal verb is different from a defective verb in that with an impersonal verb, only one possible syntactical subject is meaningful ( either expressed or not ), whereas with a defective verb, certain choices of subject might not be grammatically possible, because the verb does not have a complete conjugation.
2. An impersonal verb is different from a defective verb in that with an impersonal verb, only one possible syntactical subject is meaningful ( either expressed or not ), whereas with a defective verb, certain choices of subject might not be grammatically possible, because the verb does not have a complete conjugation.
3. NFT has also developed a number of other grammatical traits under the probable influence of Sinhala, including a postposed indefinite article, an indefinitizing postclitic  sari ( apparently modeled on Sinhala  hari ), and case assignments for defective verbs that follow the Sinhala, rather than Tamil, patterns of agreement.
4. Instead of " I remembered ", " you remembered ", etc ., these forms signify " I remember ", " you remember ", etc . Latin defective verbs also possess regularly formed pluperfect forms ( with a simple past tense meaning ) and future perfect forms ( with a simple future tense meaning ).
5. In most cases, a synonym for the defective verb must be used instead ( i . e . " to be able to " ) . ( The forms with an asterisk ( * ) are impossible, at least with respect to the relevant sense of the verb; these phonemes may by coincidence be attested with respect to a homograph [ as with " canning " = " the act of preserving and / or packaging in cans " ] .)
6. It's difficult to find defective verbs in a sentence. 用defective verbs造句挺難的
7. For example, defective verbs have a W or Y as the last root consonant, which is often reflected in paradigms with an extra final vowel in the stem ( e . g . "'r醡a / y韗mi "'" throw " from R-M-Y ); meanwhile, hollow verbs have a W or Y as the middle root consonant, and the stems of such verbs appear to have only two consonants ( e . g . "'g?: b / yig?: b "'" bring " from G-Y-B ).
8. Similarly, " should " is no longer used as the past of " shall ", but with a separate meaning indicating possibility or moral obligation . ( However, the use of the preterite form " should " as a subjunctive form continues, as in " If I should go there tomorrow, . . . ", which contrasts with the indicative form " I shall go there tomorrow " . ) The defective verb " ought " was etymologically the past tense of " owe " ( " the affection he ought his children " ), but it has since split off, leaving " owe " as a non-defective verb with its original sense and a regular past tense ( " owed " ).
9. Similarly, " should " is no longer used as the past of " shall ", but with a separate meaning indicating possibility or moral obligation . ( However, the use of the preterite form " should " as a subjunctive form continues, as in " If I should go there tomorrow, . . . ", which contrasts with the indicative form " I shall go there tomorrow " . ) The defective verb " ought " was etymologically the past tense of " owe " ( " the affection he ought his children " ), but it has since split off, leaving " owe " as a non-defective verb with its original sense and a regular past tense ( " owed " ).
更多例句：  上一頁