stored communications act造句
例句與造句
- It noted that in 2010, when the opinion was published, there were over 251, 000 cell sites in the U . S ., compared to just 913 in 1986, the year the Stored Communications Act became law.
- The historical cell site location data is then not subject to the privacy protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment standard of probable cause, but rather to the Stored Communications Act, which governs the voluntary or compelled disclosure of stored electronic communications records.
- The ACLU ( in an amicus brief filed jointly with the EFF ) argued that Section 2703 ( d ) of the Stored Communications Act gives magistrate judges the authority to require the government to obtain a warrant to obtain historical cell site information.
- A key section, known as the Stored Communications Act ( SCA ), distinguished between electronic communications services which actively transmitted and received data and remote communications services whose only role was to archive and backup transmitted data for at least some period of time.
- That law, the Stored Communications Act, grants significant protection to e-mail messages, but does not go as far as the wiretap law : it lets prosecutors access stored messages with a search warrant, while imposing stricter requirements on parties in civil suits.
- It's difficult to find stored communications act in a sentence. 用stored communications act造句挺難的
- The government had obtained the data under a provision of the Stored Communications Act that only requires showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the . . . records or other information sought, are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation . ( ).
- The district court adopted the magistrate judge's decision in a single-page ruling on November 11, 2011, stating " the standard under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U . S . C . ?703 ( d ), is below that required by the Constitution ".
- In early October 2010, law enforcement agents in Texas applied for three court orders under section 2703 ( d ) of the Stored Communications Act, seeking to compel cell phone service providers to disclose cell site information for three phones for the past 60 days . According to the district court:
- The complaint alleged violations by the School District of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, and Pennsylvania common law.
- When, in 2006, the Bush administration came under fire for having secretly collected billions of phone call details from regular Americans, ostensibly to check for calls to terror suspects, the Pen Register Act was cited, along with the Stored Communications Act, as example of how such domestic spying violated Federal law.
- In " In re Application of the United States for Historical Cell Site Data ", 724 F . 3d 600 ( 5th Cir . 2013 ), the Fifth Circuit held that court orders under the Stored Communications Act compelling cell phone providers to disclose historical cell site information are not per se unconstitutional.
- In " Klayman I ", the plaintiffs, subscribers of Verizon Wireless, brought suit against the NSA, the Department of Justice, Verizon Communications, Apple again alleging the bulk metadata collection violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment and constitutes divulgence of communication records in violation of Section 2702 of Stored Communications Act.
- In 1986, the United States Congress updated the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 by enacting the Electronic Communications Privacy Act which included an updated " Wiretap Act " and also extended Fourth Amendment-like protections to electronic communications in Title II of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, known as the Stored Communications Act.
- On March 25, 2011, Magistrate Judge Susan K . Gauvey granted the government's request to order Sprint / Nextel, Inc . to " disclose to the government'the identification and address of cellular towers ( cell site locations ) related to the use of'the Defendants'cellular telephones " pursuant to the Stored Communications Act.
- The government also contended that the Stored Communications Act's " lower'specific and articulable facts'standard provides adequate privacy protections . . . and notwithstanding recent cases [ " United States v . Antoine Jones " ], the majority of courts have concluded that " the government's acquisition of cell site location data without a warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment ".