The investment cost of microflocculation - uf progress is cheaper than the conventional treatment progress , its running cost is about $ 0 . 23 yuan / m3 微絮凝-超濾工藝的投資成本比常規(guī)工藝節(jié)省,其運行成本約為0 . 23元/ m3水。
3 . the parallel experiment proved that the water quality of microflocculation - uf progress is the best , and water quality of direct uf progress is the worst . turbidity and pathogens are removed efficiently by uf 3 .微絮凝-超濾、直接超濾、常規(guī)工藝的平行對比試驗證明:微絮凝-超濾工藝的出水水質(zhì)最好,直接超濾工藝最差。