“ the defendants were repeatedly told that their actio violated the co titution, but they chose not to heed those cautio, ” perry wrote in the preliminary injunction i ued wednesday “被告被再三告知其行為違反了憲法,但他們卻置若罔聞。”佩里在周三發(fā)表的初步禁令中寫道。
“ the defendants were repeatedly told that their actions violated the constitution, but they chose not to heed those cautions, ” perry wrote in the preliminary injunction issued wednesday “被告被再三告知其行為違反了憲法,但他們卻置若罔聞?!迸謇镌谥苋l(fā)表的初步禁令中寫道。
Part of his request is to also have the court issue a preliminary injunction to prohibit any enforcement of the gambling ban while the matter is pending as well as applying that injunction to all criminal proceedings and investigations based on alleged violations of the gambling ban 他的部分要求是,也有法院發(fā)布初步禁令,禁止任何執(zhí)法的賭禁,而此事尚待解決,以及申請禁制令,所有刑事訴訟,并依據(jù)調(diào)查對涉嫌違反賭禁
Securing judgment procedure is to protect the legal rights of creditor, under that aim, there also exist two direct aim, one is safeguard the execute of the judicial addict made in the future, the other is to avoid the unredemptive damages chapter 3 the type of civil securing judgment procedure this chapter researches into the type of civil securing judgment procedure and relevant legal basis in main countries, including the arrest and einstweligeverfugung in germany and japan, the juger en refere iprocedure and qrdanance sur requite in france, attachment, temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in u . s, pre-judgement rremedies in britain, and property preservation and advance execution in china the civil securing judgment procedure system of france, u . s . and britain don t meet the situation and tradition custom of china, while the civil securing judgment procedure system of german and japan has deficiency the conclusion of this chapter is, we should reasonably reform current civil securing judgment procedure system of china, reconstruction the dual civil securing judgment procedure system under the division of property preservation and action preservaition chaptei4 court has the power of jurisdiction this chapter researches into the court which has jurisdiction to different kinds of securing 筆者認為,民事保全程序存在審理階段的保全程序和執(zhí)行階段的程序,是特別的訴訟程序和執(zhí)行程序兼容;民事保全請求權(quán)屬于廣義上的訴權(quán);民事保全權(quán)屬于裁判權(quán)(司法權(quán))和行政權(quán)并存;民事保全程序應(yīng)當(dāng)體現(xiàn)迅速原則、全面保護雙方當(dāng)事人;權(quán)益原則、程序正當(dāng)原則、保全措施的標的有限原則;民事保全程序的總目的是為了保護債權(quán)人的合法權(quán)益,其直接目的有二:一是保障將來執(zhí)行文書的強制執(zhí)行,二是:避免將來無法挽回的損失。第三章民事保全的類型本章對各主要國家關(guān)于民事保全的類型及其依據(jù)逐一作了論述:德國和日本的假扣押與假處分、法國的緊急審理程序和依申請作出裁定的程序、美國的,、一??垩汉椭虚g禁令、英國的臨時性救濟措施、我國的財產(chǎn)保全和先予執(zhí)行。
By agreeing to arbitration, the parties do not intend to deprive any court with jurisdiction of its ability to issue a preliminary injunction, attachment or other form of provisional remedy in aid of the arbitration and a request for such provisional remedies by a party to a court shall not be deemed a waiver of this agreement to arbitrate 經(jīng)由雙方同意申請仲裁后,雙方均不得拒絕任何有權(quán)頒布初步禁令、查封或其他形式的臨時性補救措施的法庭,并且任何一方均有權(quán)向法庭提請該臨時性補救措施,且該提請將不構(gòu)成對本仲裁協(xié)議的放棄。