theory of firms

"theory of firms"的翻譯和解釋

"查查詞典"手機版

千萬人都在用的超大詞匯詞典翻譯APP

例句與用法

The mainstream of modern theory of firm has some important limits on the research of corporate governance because it is lack of thorough discussion on the internal structure of shareholders ( or proprietors )
現(xiàn)代主流企業(yè)理論未能對股東(或所有者)的內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)進行深入研究，從而對公司治理的研究存在著很大的局限性。
On the base of the time ' s changes and the newest achievements on the theory of firm , author proposes a new mode of cost management on the general speaking for the deficits of the two traditional mode of cost management
本文基于時代變化發(fā)展的特征和企業(yè)理論發(fā)展的最新成果，針對作業(yè)成本管理和成本企劃的缺陷提出作者的思考與建議，擬在一般意義上提出一種新的成本管理模式。
The focus of the theory of firm growth mechanism is on how firms achieve growth . there are mainly three modes and mechanisms of firm growth , namely organic growth , acquired growth and network based growth . and these three mechanisms are matched with the strategic thoughts of firm resource based schools , environment schools , resources dependence schools , and clusters schools respectively
企業(yè)成長機制理論主要探討企業(yè)通過什么方式實現(xiàn)成長,目前主要存在著內(nèi)部成長、并購成長和網(wǎng)絡(luò)化成長三種基本的企業(yè)成長方式和機制,它們分別對應(yīng)于企業(yè)資源基礎(chǔ)理論、環(huán)境學(xué)派、資源依賴學(xué)派和集群理論的戰(zhàn)略思想。
In the face of this puzzle , we insist on the basis of theory of firm methodologically . then we study the economic cause of formation of strategic alliance . theories of firm we use in the process of logical inference include theory of division of labor , theory of exchange , modern theory of contract and theory of property
面對這種困境,我們堅持在方法上以企業(yè)理論為基礎(chǔ),進而研究企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟的形成動因,在邏輯推理過程中所使用到的企業(yè)理論有分工理論與交換理論、現(xiàn)代契約理論和產(chǎn)權(quán)理論。
On the micro - angle , we study two aspects . on one side , we reexamine the main current game theory from individual view , unearth its disadvantages , and put forward a mechanism of coordination that will lead to the balance of cooperation . on the other side , we revise the theory of firm from organization view , analyze and compare the efficiency of all kinds of firms
本文以全方位、多層次的視角來探究協(xié)調(diào)問題:在微觀方面,我們首先從微觀個體的角度反思了主流的博弈理論,并探究達成合作博弈的協(xié)調(diào)機理;其次,從微觀組織的角度對企業(yè)的協(xié)調(diào)進行了分析,重新審視了企業(yè)的性質(zhì)及其規(guī)模擴展的狀況,并從協(xié)調(diào)的角度比較了各類企業(yè)的效率。
The study are including : [ 1 ] analyse of chongqing soe " economy condition and framework of human resource . lower benefit of soe was caused without effective incentive system . [ 2 ] the paper puts forword a systematic theoretic pattern of the employee stock ownership plan , by adopting prior reseearch findings of modern theory of firms , human capital theory , etc , [ 3 ] analyse the examples of case
故對員工持股的應(yīng)用制定操作步驟，提供操作規(guī)范；通過對重慶天友乳品有限公司員工持股的案例分析，為員工持股在國有企業(yè)改革中應(yīng)用提供可以借鑒的范例，并討論了應(yīng)用中存在的問題，提出解決的思路。
On the basis of analyzing and summarizing the conventional theories , the transactions costs economics and penrose theory , this dissertation draws the competence theory of the firm ( cohen and levinthal , 1990 , 1994 ) and the behavior theory of firm adaptation ( march , 1991 ; levinthal and march , 1993 ) into an analytical system for diversification , and constructs a learning - based research framework grounded by the exploitation and exploration of knowledge resource
本研究在分析和總結(jié)傳統(tǒng)多角化理論基礎(chǔ)? ?交易成本經(jīng)濟學(xué)和penrose理論的基礎(chǔ)上，將企業(yè)能力理論( cohenandlevinthal ， 1990 ， 1994 )與企業(yè)行為適應(yīng)理論( march ， 1991 ； levinthalandmarch ， 1993 )引入多角化分析框架，并以企業(yè)知識資源的充分利用與開發(fā)為主線建立起了一個基于學(xué)習(xí)視角的研究架構(gòu)。
They are the contractal theory of the firm , the principal - agent theory of the firm , the managerial theory of the firm , the entrepreneurial theory of the firm and the entrepreneurial - contractal theory of firm etc . . they are the theoretical basis for the discussion on the enterprise institution in russiachapter two and chapter three is a studying about the arrangement and change with the enterprise institution in sovielthe state is the enterprise in sovielthe state hold the residual claims , and residual controlbecause there are multi - aims of the state and long chain of the principal , but there is not the effective incentive and monitoring in the arranggementdie institution is uneflective . lt is the why the enterprise institution was restructured at the beginning of the new russia
這是對俄羅斯企業(yè)制度“前身”的考察，它的基本特征是：國家就是企業(yè)，國家既是剩余索取權(quán)擁有者，又是剩余控制權(quán)擁有者；國家的多目的性、過長的委托鏈、激勵和監(jiān)督的缺乏使這種制度安排沒有效率，改革(制度變遷)因為沒有觸及問題的實質(zhì)而功效甚微，這?切就成了日后俄羅斯重建企業(yè)制度的最根本的原因。第二篇是重建和現(xiàn)狀篇，由五章構(gòu)成。第四章主要討論俄羅斯企業(yè)制度的重建，它是以私有化的形式出現(xiàn)在歷史舞臺上的。