Objective to compare the effect of anterior and transtrochanteric surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty 摘要目的比較經(jīng)大粗隆切口與前切口在初次髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中的應(yīng)用特點。
Conclusion the choice of approach in primary total hip arthroplasty brings no functional difference , but the anterior approach is a safer technique with faster postoperative recovery 結(jié)論手術(shù)切口的選擇對髖關(guān)節(jié)置換的術(shù)后功能無影響,但前切口在初次全髖置換術(shù)中具有損傷小、恢復(fù)快的優(yōu)勢。
Methods retrospective study was undertaken in one hundred patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty ( tha ) ( fifty , anterior approach ; fifty , transtrochanteric approach ) with one year follow - up 方法100例首次全髖置換患者,手術(shù)人路為經(jīng)大粗隆和前切口的各50例,術(shù)后隨訪一年進行回顧性研究。