" in no way has gay marriage lent legitimacy to polygamy “無論從哪個(gè)角度來講,同性婚姻都不會(huì)給多配偶制帶來合法性。
Are the globe editorialists correct that gay marriage hasn ' t lent legitimacy to polygamy 《全球郵報(bào)》的社論作者們說同性婚姻未給多配偶制帶來合法性,他們的這種說法正確嗎?
These horrible crimes do occur in polygamous marriages ? and monogamous ones ? and must be dealt with severely 多配偶制婚姻中確實(shí)存在這些可怕的罪行? ?一夫一妻制婚姻也不例外,它們必須受到嚴(yán)肅對(duì)待。
I don ' t agree with either gay marriage or polygamy for exactly the same reason : both prevent marriage from fulfilling its primary goal 我既不同意同性婚姻,也不贊成多配偶制,這完全是基于同樣的理由:兩者都妨礙婚姻實(shí)現(xiàn)自己的基本目標(biāo)。
This case exemplifies a combination of monogamous gay marriage ( lesbian spouses ) and a polygamous family structure ( the spouses and the sperm donor ) 這個(gè)案例通過例證的方式體現(xiàn)了一夫一妻制同性婚姻(女同性戀配偶)和多配偶制家庭結(jié)構(gòu)(兩個(gè)配偶和一名精子捐獻(xiàn)者)的一種結(jié)合。
And if , as the court of appeal of ontario just ruled , a child can have three legal parents , why should that number not be further extended in polygamous families 而且,如果一個(gè)孩子可以擁有三個(gè)合法的父母,如同安大略上訴法院裁決的那樣,那么為什么這個(gè)數(shù)字不能進(jìn)一步在多配偶制家庭中加以擴(kuò)大呢?
But are we being fair and just in retaining one alternative form of marriage , polygamy , as a crime , when we have legalised another alternative form , gay marriage 但是我們?cè)诎鸦橐龅囊环N替代形式(同性婚姻)合法化的同時(shí),卻堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為它的另一種替代形式(多配偶制婚姻)是一種犯罪,這種做法公平合理嗎?