Reflection on cognitional requirements for theoretical innovation 略談理論創(chuàng)新的認(rèn)識條件
The practical significance of cognitional education made by media 實(shí)施媒介認(rèn)知教育刻不容緩
Before making the definition of the cognitional falsity , the most important is to define the content of the cognition ( object ) 在對認(rèn)識錯(cuò)誤進(jìn)行定義之前,重要的是界定認(rèn)識的內(nèi)容(對象) 。
There are several cognitional elements which has been discussed in this part , the ability to observe , the ability to image , thinking and intuition 在認(rèn)知心理諸要素中,觀察一直是作為科學(xué)創(chuàng)造中的一種顯性因素,曾一度被認(rèn)為是科學(xué)創(chuàng)造的起點(diǎn)。
Through investigating some foreign countries ’ standing criminal laws , we could conclude that the cognitional falsity has been assured by many countries ’ penal legislations 通過對國外的一些現(xiàn)行刑法的考察可以看出:認(rèn)識錯(cuò)誤已經(jīng)為很多國家的刑法立法所確認(rèn)。
In conclusion , cognitional preference and the acquisition of social cognition are major factors contribution to children ' s development of aggressive behaviors 通過這個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)我們研究了攻擊性兒童和非攻擊性兒童的社會觀點(diǎn)采擇能力是否有區(qū)別,以及年齡因素的影摘要4響。
According to the cognitional single item , there will be a great divergence in the character which should be known by the actor whether the behavior belongs to the social bane or illegality code 但依據(jù)認(rèn)識一要件說,行為人所認(rèn)識到的行為的性質(zhì)是社會危害性還是刑事違法性也存在很大的分歧。
As the development of society and the advancement of age , it begins to & doubted about the conventional attitude for the relationship between cognitional error in law and criminal responsibility 摘要隨著社會的發(fā)展和時(shí)代的進(jìn)步,關(guān)于法律認(rèn)識錯(cuò)誤與刑事責(zé)任關(guān)系的傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)開始受到人們的質(zhì)疑。
Based on the psychological mechanism of understanding of cognitional psychology , the second part analyzes the process of understanding biological knowledge , and theoretically supports the making out of biological - teaching strategy on " understanding " objective 第二部分根據(jù)認(rèn)知心理學(xué)關(guān)于理解的心理機(jī)制,剖析了生物學(xué)知識的理解過程,為“理解”目標(biāo)的生物學(xué)教學(xué)策略的制訂提供理論依據(jù)。
Based on the real - life society and respecting to the history , the author thinks that we should persist in the all - sided and impersonal view and combine theories and practice in our dealings with the relationship between cognitional error in law and criminal responsibility 應(yīng)本著立足于現(xiàn)實(shí)社會,尊重歷史的精神,堅(jiān)持客觀、全面的觀點(diǎn),從理論與實(shí)踐相結(jié)合的角度重新審視法律認(rèn)識錯(cuò)誤與刑事責(zé)任的關(guān)系問題。