judicial adj. 1.司法的,審判上的。 2.審判員的;法官的;法院的;法院判決的[規(guī)定的]。 3.法官似的,符合法官身分的。 4.考慮周到的;慎重的;公平的,公正的。 5.【宗教】上帝審判的。 judicial affairs 司法。 a judicial assembly 審判大會。 the judicial bench 〔集合詞〕法官。 judicial circles = the judicial world 司法界。 the judicial departments 司法部門。 the J- Department (Office) 司法部。 judicial gravity 像審判員那樣嚴肅。 a judicial pestilence 天降瘟疫。 a biography judicial in purpose 一本批判性的傳記。 a man with a judicial mind 內(nèi)心公正的人。 judicial functions 司法職能。 adv. -ly
Article 3 the people ' s courts shall , in accordance with the law , exercise judicial power independently with respect to administrative cases , and shall not be subject to interference by any administrative organ , public organization or individual 第三條人民法院依法對行政案件獨立行使審判權(quán),不受行政機關(guān)、社會團體和個人的干涉。
Article 5 the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently in accordance with law and the people ' s procuratorates shall exercise procuratorial power independently in accordance with law , and they shall be free from interference by any administrative organ , public organization or individual 第五條人民法院依照法律規(guī)定獨立行使審判權(quán),人民檢察院依照法律規(guī)定獨立行使檢察權(quán),不受行政機關(guān)、社會團體和個人的干涉。
With an eye to the systematic of judicial interpretation , the inherent requirement of judicial independence , the nature of criminal adjudication , the accordance of power and responsibili ty , and the semanteme of judicial independence , the author finds out that the principle of " the people ' s courts shall exercise judicial power independently " shall also include the personal independence of individual judges . on this basis , the author reviews the adjudicative power endowed with the adjudicatory committee by law and holds that this provision has its historical significance , yet its application in today brings more malpractice than benefits . its application goes against the justness , the quality and the efficiency of the administration of justice , and goes against the realization of other important functions of the adjudicatory committee , the improvement of the skills and abilities of the judges 在此基礎上,筆者對我國法律賦予審判委員會實質(zhì)意義上的裁判權(quán)的規(guī)定進行了評析,認為,審判委員會行使裁判權(quán),雖然有其存在的歷史原因,但在現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)是弊大于利,它不利于司法公正,不利于保證案件質(zhì)量,不利于提高訴訟效率,不利于提高訴訟效益,不利于審判委員會其他職能的正常發(fā)揮,不利于提高法官素質(zhì),理論界和實務界提出的種種保留審判委員會的裁判權(quán)的主張,并不能克服審判委員會行使裁判權(quán)的弊端,因此,應當取消審判委員會的裁判權(quán)(不是廢除審判委員會) ,法定的裁判者只能是負責個案審判的法官和人民陪審員。