量刑 [法律] measurement of penalty; 光量刑 light quantum◇量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn) criterion for imposing penalty; criterion of imposing penalty; 量刑幅度 extent for measurement of punishment
criterion量刑 criterion for sentencing; sentencing; criterion for sentencing; sentencing
量刑情節(jié) circumstance for sentencing; principle of discretionary action of sentencing principal of sentencing; principle of discretionary action of sentencing; principal of sentencing
原則 principle 原則分歧 differences in principle; 原則上同意 agree in principle; 原則問(wèn)題 a matter of principle; 原則性(的)錯(cuò)誤 mistake in matters of principle; 基本原則 basic principle; axiom; 原則立場(chǎng) principled stand; 原則上諒解 understanding on principles; 用原則作交易 barter away principles; trade in principles
法定量刑情節(jié) legally prescribed circumstances of sentencing
Research on chinese ancient principle of punishment 中國(guó)古代量刑原則
The scholars from mainland china said there is no difference between the concept of basic criterion for sentencing and the principle of sentencing in terms of the harm to society and the danger to human being 我國(guó)大陸學(xué)者也有持這種觀點(diǎn)的,比如陳興良、張明楷先生就認(rèn)為,量刑基準(zhǔn)與量刑原則的含義基本相同,是指社會(huì)危害性和人身危險(xiǎn)性。
First , the author thinks that the ci should not be negated completely because its exis - tance has reasonableness in theory and applicableness in practice ; second , the author thinks that the ci is neither a criminal fundamental principle , nor only a sentence principle , but a criminal application principle guiding the sentence and execution of penalty ; third , on the basis of clear answer to the preceding problems , the author makes a demonstration of the relation between the principle of ci and the principle of suiting punishment to crime . thinking that they two , on the level of criminal application , condition each other to get equilibrium and serve the judicial criminal application together 首先,作者認(rèn)為不應(yīng)該對(duì)刑罰個(gè)別化全盤否定,它的存在有理論上的合理性及實(shí)踐上的可行性;其次,作者認(rèn)為刑罰個(gè)別化原則既不是刑法的基本原則,也不只是量刑原則,而是指導(dǎo)量刑和行刑的刑罰適用原則;再次,在對(duì)前兩個(gè)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行明確回答的基礎(chǔ)上,作者對(duì)刑罰個(gè)別化與罪刑相適應(yīng)的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了論證,認(rèn)為刑罰個(gè)別化與罪刑相適應(yīng)在刑罰適用層面上相互制約、彼此平衡,共同服務(wù)于刑罰公正適用。
Therefore there are two points of views on the basic criterion for sentencing . one is that judges should consider the principle and element of sentencing when they pass sentences . the other is the typical state of criminals should be considered when judges pass sentencing according to or consulting the criterion and scope of penalty 可見,關(guān)于量刑基準(zhǔn)的內(nèi)涵學(xué)者們主要有兩種意見,一種意見是,量刑時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮的量刑原則和要素,另一種意見是,量刑時(shí)對(duì)犯罪的典型形態(tài)應(yīng)當(dāng)依照或者參照的刑罰中國(guó)政法人學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文量刑基準(zhǔn)論幅度標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。