When choosing college speciality , one of the major tasks is to understand own dominance aptitude , this essay with a brief overview of gardner ' s intelligence pluralism , sternbetg ' s intelligence theory and gatb . the purpose of present study is to develop the speciality ability scale for university students 為了幫助學(xué)生更好地了解自己的能力傾向優(yōu)勢(shì),為其大學(xué)專業(yè)選擇時(shí)提供一些科學(xué)有效的指導(dǎo),本研究借鑒gardner的智力多元論、 sternberg的智力三分理論、 gatb等對(duì)能力結(jié)構(gòu)的論述,依據(jù)訪談資料和學(xué)生開(kāi)放式問(wèn)卷調(diào)查的結(jié)果,編制出“大學(xué)生專業(yè)能力問(wèn)卷”作為研究工具。
Part four , based on the opinions of two famous pluralists - - - - - - weber and davidson , at the dimension of analytic philosophy , i give a new advice on unifying these three approaches and to explicate the rationality of my advice . in part five , i briefly narrate my thought of explanation in social science 第三章以韋伯( maxweber )和戴維森( donalddavidson )的多元論思想為范本,從分析哲學(xué)的角度,借助現(xiàn)代國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的成果,提出融貫三派的新建議,說(shuō)明弱化的規(guī)律與弱化的規(guī)則相結(jié)合的可能性。
The composition doctrine declares that international commercial arbitration power are composed of certain elements of contractual power judicial power and autonomous characteristics , so this doctrine can be further divided into three unitary doctrines and three complex doctrines . the given disposition power doctrine believes internat 構(gòu)成說(shuō)認(rèn)為,國(guó)際商事仲裁權(quán)的性質(zhì)是由契約論、司法權(quán)論和自治論三種學(xué)說(shuō)單獨(dú)或組合而成,由此形成了三種單一論主張和三種混合多元論主張。
Around these 3 questions , the paper chooses respectively the representative delegates of different approaches : naturalism , antinaturalism , and pluralism . in this process , i focus on refuting the arguments which believe social laws are either impossible , impractical , or ungainable . finally , i aim to find a way to mitigate those arguments : to weaken the concept of laws to unify laws and rules , and by this way do i want to support the coexistence of different methodologies 本文以這三個(gè)問(wèn)題為中心,挑選自然主義、反自然主義及多元論的幾位典型代表人物的觀點(diǎn)來(lái)展開(kāi)論述,重點(diǎn)在于反駁堅(jiān)持社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)律不存在、不實(shí)際或不可獲得的觀點(diǎn),為化解關(guān)鍵爭(zhēng)論找到一個(gè)途徑:弱化“規(guī)律”概念,融規(guī)律與規(guī)則于一體,以期將此作為支持不同方法論的存在的突破口。